It is For Objects, Not Animals!

Most people treat their dogs better than they treat their tables. Why? Because we know that our dogs have feelings, and deserve basic consideration.

speciesism language jane goodall

“The way we write about other animals shapes the way we see them — we must recognize that every individual nonhuman animal is a ‘who,’ not a ‘what.’ ” -Dr. Jane Goodall

It is time our language changed to reflect the fact that animals are living, feeling beings with complex experiences. Animals are not objects.

The incredible power duo of In Defense of Animals and Animals and Media has decided enough is enough. In an open letter, they are calling for an update to the Associated Press (AP) Stylebook’s guidance on the use of personal pronouns. Because animals are whonot what. 80 other powerful voices of this movement have signed on.

Jane Velez-Mitchell sits down with Alicia Graef of In Defense of Animals, and Carrie Freeman and Debra Merskin of Animals & Media.

The letter begins with a compelling anecdote. Jane Goodall began the effort 40+ years ago, and we still have a long way to go:

“In the 1960s, world-renowned ethologist and conservationist Dr. Jane Goodall submitted her first scientific paper on chimpanzees that was promptly returned to her to be edited. Every place she had written he or she to describe a chimpanzee had been replaced with it, and every who had been replaced with which.

Goodall refused to budge and won a small battle for nonhuman animals back then, but decades later we’re still waiting for respected style guides like The Associated Press Stylebook to catch up on the relative pronouns used to describe them.” –Open Letter 

Could Language be the Key?

Short answer: yes. If we reframe the way we talk and think about animals, our behavior will change. When we call animals ‘it,’ we downgrade them.

peta specieism

PETA has gone viral promoting alternatives to speciesist language

Changing the way we talk about animals is one of the many ways we can fight against speciesism.

Speciesism” is the human-held belief that all other animal species are inferior. Speciesist thinking involves considering animals—who have their own desires, needs, and complex lives—as means to human ends.” -PETA

Using language that reduces animals to objects is speciesist.

Media is Failing Us!

Unsurprisingly, the AP has failed to respond. It’s common practice for the media industry to ignore any & all pleas from the public to give animals basic consideration.

power of language

The Associated Press has yet to respond.

By failing to report these key issues, the media fails society. Why isn’t the media publicly linking animal agriculture and climate change? Why isn’t the media transparently stating the link between the current zoonotic pandemic and animal exploitation?

Changing the way we talk about animals would have a great impact on the way we treat them. Changing the way we treat animals would have a monumental impact on the planet, world hunger, and many other topics that directly impact human lives.

How much more compelling would language be if we gave animals the value they deserve? “Journalists could see animals as sources of news,” says Carrie Freeman. “If any story that we’re telling affects species beyond than just the human, the interests of those species need to be included in the story.” It is simply inaccurate to see animals as ‘it.’